17. Inscription in honour of Constantine II Caesar (in Latin) from Tubernuc by five praet. praefects (Antioch’s twin inscr.)
In the PLRE I (pp. 3, 331-332, 656, 911-912, 915)
Editions
ILTun 814
Poinssot, Lantier 1924, p. 230
AE 1925, 0072
Baynes 1925, p. 204
Piganiol 1929, p. 142
Barnes 1982, p. 134
Feissel 1985, p. 423
AE 1985, 0869
Di Maio 1992, p. 195
Ghalia, Mahfoudh 2003, p. 786, nt. 11
Porena 2003, p. 467
Salway 2007, p. 1282
Olszaniec 2014, p. 20
Photos
Ghalia, Mahfoudh 2003, p. 785, fig. 8
Links
Praetorian prefects
Papius Pacatianus
Flavius Ablabius
Valerius Felix
Annius Tiberianus
Nestorius Timonianus
Date of the inscription
336 AD
Provenance and location
Ancient city: Tubernuc
Modern city: Aïn-Tebornock (Tunisia)
Province: Africa Proconsularis
Diocese: Africa (see below)
Regional prefecture: Africa
Provenance: Tubernuc, thermal baths
Current location: Tubernuc archaeological site’s depository
Ancient location: public place
Type and material of the support and text layout
Type of support: statue base
Material: limestone
Reuse:
- Reuse of the inscribed field: yes (on the opposite side the surface is rough)
- Reuse of the monument: none
- Opistographic: no
Dimensions of support: Height: 46 cm. Width: 58 cm. Breadth: 48 cm.
Dimensions of letters: unknown.
Inscribed field
One inscribed field (frons).
Damaged: reduced on the lower and upper parts; at line 4 nob(ilissimo) Caes(ari) was erased and substituted for Aug(usto) and also at line 5-6 the name of the praetorian prefect Valerius Felix was chiselled away, probably suffering damnatio memoriae.
Writing technique: chiselled
Language: Latin
Rhythm: prose
Palaeography: rustic capitals
Text category
Honorary inscription for Constantine II Caesar
Latin text
tate omnes aṇ[tecellenti], d(omino) n(ostro) Fl(avio) Clau=
dio Consta[n]t[ino iu]niori
«Aug(usto)»,
5L(ucius) Pap(ius) Pacatianus, Fl(avius) Ablabius, ⟦[Val(erius)]⟧
⟦[Felix]⟧, C. Annius Tiberianus, Nes=
[to]ri[u]s Timonianus, viri cla=
[rissimi, p]raefecti pretorio (sic).
Critical edition
This edition is based on Feissel 1985.
2: a[ntecedenti]: AE 1925, 72, a[ntecellenti]: Di Maio 1992, p. 195, Salway 2007, p. 1282, Olszaniec 2014, p. 20
4: nob(ilissimo) Caes(ari) was carefully obliterated and substituted for Aug(usto).
5-6: [adfinis Caesaris] or [necessarius Caesaris]: Piganiol 1929, p. 142; [Valerius Maximus]: Barnes 1982, pp. 134-135
Translations
English
“To our master Flavius Claudius Constantinus the young, Augustus, memorable for his virtue and clemency, who stands out among everyone for his devotion, Papius Pacatianus, Flavius Ablabius, Valerius Felix, Annius Tiberianus and Nestorius Timonianus praetorian prefects of clarissimus rank.”
French
“A notre maître Flavius Claudius Constantinus le jeune, Auguste, mémorable pour sa vertu et sa clémence et qui se distingue parmi tous par son dévouement, les clarissimes préfets du prétoire, Papius Pacatianus, Flavius Ablabius, Valerius Felix, Annius Tiberianus et Nestorius Timonianus.”
Italian
“Al nostro signore Flavius Claudius Costantinus iuniore, Augusto, memorabile per la sua virtù e per la sua clemenza e che primeggia davanti a tutti per la sua devozione, i prefetti del pretorio chiarissimi, Papius Pacatianus, Flavius Ablabius, Valerius Felix, Annius Tiberianus e Nestorius Timonianus.”
The inscription and its prefects: critical commentary, updating, overviews
The inscription was found in 1924 near the thermal baths (not far from the spring) of Aïn-Tebornock in Tunisia (the ancient Roman municipium of Tubernuc).
This Roman municipium was a fertile, rich and strategic area later used and fortified by the Byzantines and Arabs. The monument in question was so probably preserved due to the byzantine fortification around the city and the restoration of the thermal baths during the Byzantine period. Indeed, the thermal baths had direct access to the forum and, given its civic nature, our monument may have come from there. Thereafter, the monument may have been reused in the restoration of the thermal baths, which was attested under Gratian and Valentinian II (Ghalia-Mahfoudh 2003, pp. 784-786).
The inscription is a dedication solely in honour of Constantine II Caesar (altered to substitute the title Augustus), made by the college of praetorian prefects in 336 AD: only four prefects appear, but there is an evident erasure. The recent exceptional discovery of another dedication in honour of Constantine II Caesar at Antioch (PPRET 18) raised by the same prefects – the two inscriptions are in effect twins – reveals that the prefectural college had five members and not four as suggested in the Tubernuc inscription. Apart from providing us with useful data concerning the Constantinian prefectural college between 335 and 336 AD, these monuments also show the multiplication of the number of praetorian prefects, all of whom were serving at the same time.
A comparison with the inscription recently discovered at Antioch allows us to restore the gaps in the text of this African monument. Thus, the empty space between the fifth and sixth line that follows Ablabius’ name did not retain a phrase describing the prefect’s relation by marriage to the imperial family (adfinis or necessarius Caesaris, see Poinssot-Lantier 1924, p. 229; cf. Palanque 1933, pp. 17-19). The Antioch dedication furnishes us with the name of another prefect, but not that of Valerius Maximus (PLRE I, Maximus 49, pp. 590-591) as Barnes claimes (Barnes 1982, pp. 134-135), but Valerius Felix (PLRE I, Felix 2, pp. 331-332), praetorian prefect of Africa, as Chastagnol remarkably suggested (Chastagnol 1968, pp. 333-337; this was before the Antioch inscription had been discovered).
To resume, the prefectural college of Constantine between 335 and 336 AD consisted of Papius Pacatianus (PLRE I, Pacatianus 2, p. 656), Flavius Ablabius (PLRE I, Ablabius 4, pp. 3-4), Valerius Felix (PLRE I, Felix 2, pp. 331-332), Annius Tiberianus (PLRE I, Tiberianus 4, pp. 911-912) and Nestorius Timonianus (PLRE I, p. 915; for their career see PPRET 18).
We do not know why the name of Felix was deleted in Africa, but not in Syria. After Constantine’s death his loyal prefects or ex-prefects were all removed or killed, as happened to Ablabius (see PPRET 18), but the fate that befell Felix is unknown (cf. Porena 2003, p. 470, nt. 203).
The second deletion is nevertheless useful in dating this inscription: the imperial title nobilissimus Caesar (preserved in the Antioch inscription l. 3 as ἐπιφανέστατον Καίσαρα) was replaced with Aug(usto) probably at the time of the elevation of Constantine II to Augustus in September 337 AD, thus our monument must necessarily date before that time. Already Feissel (1985, p. 435) and then Porena (2003, pp. 476-491) analyzed the chronology of the five praetorian prefect’s mandates and placed a terminus post quem at July 15th, 335 AD, when Annius Tiberianus was still vicarius Hispaniarum (CTh 03, 05, 06), and a terminus ante quem on July 21th, 336 AD, when Gregorius (Valerius Felix’s successor), was mentioned for the first time in office as praetorian prefect (CTh 04, 06, 03). During this time span, these two coeval inscriptions were made to celebrate the emperor for the Vicennalia of Constantine II on March 1st, 336 AD. This would be a suitable occasion for the prefects to erect a series of identical monuments, of which only the ones in Tubernuc and Antioch survive. These two cities were politically and culturally different: Tubernuc was only a small Roman municipium, whereas Antioch was an important administrative centre, capital of the Eastern diocese (see also PPRET 18).
The discovery of the monuments in such diverse cities lends itself to the idea that these dedications may well have been quite widely spread over the whole empire. These monuments were built by the provincial governors in the different cities under the control of each prefect.
Bibliography
Barnes T.D., The New Empire of Diocletian and Constantine, Cambridge 1982.
Barnes T.D., Praetorian prefects, 337-361, ZPE, 94, 1992, 249-260.
Baynes N.H., Three Notes on the Reform of Diocletian and Constantine, JRS, 15, 1925, 195-208.
Chastagnol A., Les préfets du prétoire de Constantin, REA, 70, 1968, 321-352.
Chastagnol A., Les inscriptions africaines des préfets du prétoire de Constantin, in Mastino A. (a cura di), L'Africa romana: atti del 3. Convegno di studio, 13-15 dicembre 1985, Sassari 1986, 263-273 (= Chastagnol A., Aspects de l’Antiquité Tardive, Roma 1994, 81-92).
Coşkun A., Die Praefecti praesent(al)es und die Regionalisierung der Praetorianer-praefekturen im vierten Jahrhundert, Millennium, 1, 2004, 279-328.
Feissel D., Une dédicace en honneur de Constantin II César et les préfets du prétoire de 336, in Dagron G., Feissel D., Inscriptions inédites du musée d’Antioche, T&MByz, 9, 1985, 421-461 (= Feissel D., Documents, droit, diplomatique de l’Empire romain tardif, Paris 2010, 385-398).
Ghalia T., Mahfoudh F., Aïn Tebournouk-Tubernuc et sa région de l’Antiquité tardive au Moyen Âge, MEFRA, 115, 2003, 779-807.
Gkoutzioukostas A., The Reforms of Constantine the Great in Provincial Administration: a Critical Approach to the Conclusions of Modern Research, Byzantina, 34, 2015-2016, 93-110.
Kelly C., Bureaucracy and Government, in Lenski N. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine, Cambridge 2007, 183-204.
Olszaniec S., Praefektura praetorio Italii, Illyrikum i Afryki (312–425 n.e.), Toruń 2014.
Palanque J-R., Essai sur la préfecture du prétoire du bas-empire, Paris 1933.
Piganiol A., Notes épigraphiques, REA, 31, 1929, 139-150.
Poinssot L., Lantier R., Quatre préfets du prétoire contemporains de Constantin, CRAI, 68, 1924, 229-233.
Porena P., Le origini della prefettura del pretorio tardoantica, Roma 2003.
Salway B., The Praetorian Prefecture of Africa under Constantine: a Phantom?, in Acta XII Congressus internationalis epigraphiae Graecae et Latinae: Provinciae imperii Romani inscriptionibus descriptae, II, Barcelona 2007, 1281-1286.
Praetorian prefects and epigraphic habit
Number of praetorian prefects in this inscription
All the praetorian prefects in office
Inscribed monuments made by praetorian prefects
Inscriptions to Augusti/Caesars made by all the praetorian prefects
Praetorian prefect is the author of a monument, but is struck by damnatio
The praetorian prefecture in inscriptions: titulature, duration and extension of the appointment
The rank of the praetorian prefects: viri cla[rissimi]
Latin / Greek titulature of the office: [p]raefecti pretorio
Inscription is without a cursus honorum
Inscription only records the current prefecture
Inscription does not record the regional area of the prefecture